Why is Snapmaker 2.0 A250T better than SOVOL Comgrow T300 ?
Has 0.05 smaller minimum layer height
has auto bed leveling
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Snapmaker 2.0 A250T vs SOVOL Comgrow T300
Feature | Snapmaker 2.0 A250T | SOVOL Comgrow T300 |
|---|---|---|
1149 $ BEST | 239 $ | |
– | 631 x 503 x 831 mm | |
N/A | 20.5 kg | |
FDM | FDM | |
230 x 235 x 250 mm | 300 x 350 x 300 mm | |
0.4 mm | 0.4 mm | |
0.05–0.3 mm | N/A mm | |
275 °C | N/A °C | |
Wi-Fi, USB cable, USB flash drive | WiFi, USB | |
No | No | |
Yes | No | |
No | No | |
N/A mm/s | 600 mm/s | |
N/A mm/s² | 12000 mm/s² | |
Direct Drive | Dual-Gear Direct Drive | |
PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU (≥95A), Wood-filled PLA | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PC, ASA, Nylon, Carbon-fiber blends | |
No | No | |
Yes | No | |
More Details | View on Snapmaker | View on SOVOL |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Snapmaker 2.0 A250T and SOVOL Comgrow T300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
