Why is Snapmaker 2.0 A350T better than Qidi X Max 3 ?
Has 0.05 smaller minimum layer height
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Qidi X Max 3 vs Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
Feature | Qidi X Max 3 | Snapmaker 2.0 A350T |
|---|---|---|
599 $ | 1099 $ BEST | |
FDM | FDM | |
325 x 315 x 325 mm | 320 x 330 x 350 mm | |
0.4 mm | 0.4 mm | |
N/A mm | 0.05–0.3 mm | |
350 °C BEST | 275 °C | |
N/A | Wi-Fi, USB cable, USB flash drive | |
Yes | No | |
Yes | Yes | |
No | No | |
600 mm/s | N/A mm/s | |
20000 mm/s² | N/A mm/s² | |
High-flow Direct Drive Extruder | Direct Drive | |
PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, TPU, PC, PA, carbon/glass fiber composites | PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU (≥95A), Wood-filled PLA | |
Yes | No | |
No | Yes | |
More Details | View on Qidi | View on Snapmaker |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Qidi X Max 3 and Snapmaker 2.0 A350T in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
