Why is Snapmaker 2.0 A250T better than Prusa Core One ?
Has 0.05 smaller minimum layer height
has auto bed leveling
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Prusa Core One vs Snapmaker 2.0 A250T
Feature | Prusa Core One | Snapmaker 2.0 A250T |
|---|---|---|
1349 $ BEST | 1149 $ | |
FDM | FDM | |
220 x 250 x 220 mm | 230 x 235 x 250 mm | |
0.4 mm | 0.4 mm | |
N/A mm | 0.05–0.3 mm | |
N/A °C | 275 °C | |
N/A | Wi-Fi, USB cable, USB flash drive | |
No | No | |
No | Yes | |
No | No | |
220 mm/s | N/A mm/s | |
2000 mm/s² | N/A mm/s² | |
Direct Drive | Direct Drive | |
PLA, PETG, ASA, TPU | PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU (≥95A), Wood-filled PLA | |
Yes | No | |
Yes | Yes | |
More Details | View on Prusa | View on Snapmaker |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Prusa Core One and Snapmaker 2.0 A250T in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
