Why is Anycubic Photon Mono M7 better than SOVOL Comgrow T300 ?
Has 0.01 smaller minimum layer height
has enclosure
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Anycubic Photon Mono M7 vs SOVOL Comgrow T300
Feature | Anycubic Photon Mono M7 | SOVOL Comgrow T300 |
|---|---|---|
299 $ BEST | 239 $ | |
– | 631 x 503 x 831 mm | |
N/A | 20.5 kg | |
Resin | FDM | |
180 x 160 x 180 mm | 300 x 350 x 300 mm | |
N/A mm | 0.4 mm | |
0.01–0.1 mm | N/A mm | |
60 °C | N/A °C | |
USB, Wi-Fi | WiFi, USB | |
Yes | No | |
No | No | |
No | No | |
N/A mm/s | 600 mm/s | |
N/A mm/s² | 12000 mm/s² | |
N/A | Dual-Gear Direct Drive | |
N/A | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PC, ASA, Nylon, Carbon-fiber blends | |
No | No | |
No | No | |
More Details | View on Anycubic | View on SOVOL |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Anycubic Photon Mono M7 and SOVOL Comgrow T300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
