Why is Snapmaker 2.0 A250T better than Anycubic Photon Mono 4 ?
Has 0.04 smaller minimum layer height
has auto bed leveling
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Anycubic Photon Mono 4 vs Snapmaker 2.0 A250T
Feature | Anycubic Photon Mono 4 | Snapmaker 2.0 A250T |
|---|---|---|
199 $ | 1149 $ BEST | |
Resin | FDM | |
132 x 80 x 165 mm | 230 x 235 x 250 mm | |
N/A mm | 0.4 mm | |
0.01–0.1 mm | 0.05–0.3 mm BEST | |
60 °C | 275 °C BEST | |
USB, Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi, USB cable, USB flash drive | |
Yes | No | |
No | Yes | |
No | No | |
N/A mm/s | N/A mm/s | |
N/A mm/s² | N/A mm/s² | |
N/A | Direct Drive | |
N/A | PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU (≥95A), Wood-filled PLA | |
No | No | |
No | Yes | |
More Details | View on Anycubic | View on Snapmaker |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Anycubic Photon Mono 4 and Snapmaker 2.0 A250T in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
