Why is Snapmaker 2.0 A350T better than Anycubic Kobra X ?
Has 0.05 smaller minimum layer height
has auto bed leveling
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Anycubic Kobra X vs Snapmaker 2.0 A350T
Feature | Anycubic Kobra X | Snapmaker 2.0 A350T |
|---|---|---|
259 $ | 1099 $ BEST | |
441.5 x 448.8 x 451.3 mm | – | |
9.5 kg | N/A | |
FDM | FDM | |
260 x 260 x 260 mm | 320 x 330 x 350 mm | |
0.4 mm | 0.4 mm | |
N/A mm | 0.05–0.3 mm | |
N/A °C | 275 °C | |
Dual-band Wi-Fi (2.4G/5G), LAN, USB | Wi-Fi, USB cable, USB flash drive | |
No | No | |
No | Yes | |
No | No | |
600 mm/s | N/A mm/s | |
20000 mm/s² | N/A mm/s² | |
Direct Drive | Direct Drive | |
PLA, PETG, TPU, PVA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, ASA | PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU (≥95A), Wood-filled PLA | |
No | No | |
No | Yes | |
More Details | View on Anycubic | View on Snapmaker |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Anycubic Kobra X and Snapmaker 2.0 A350T in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
